Water Conservation

We're killing the Gulf of Mexico: Learn about what we are doing that causes the ocean to die.

The Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone: What Can Be Done to Change It?

At a staggering 5,052 square miles, the Gulf of Mexico’s dead zone has become a focal point for the growing number of people worried about what humans are doing to harm the planet’s environment.

Now the size of the state of Connecticut, the dead zone is an area of low oxygen water, otherwise known as hypoxia. The area covers almost the entire coast of Louisiana and the section of the Texas Gulf coast extended east from Galveston Bay to the Texas-Louisiana border.

The dead zone typically appears every spring and lasts through the summer.

Hypoxia makes it difficult for plant and marine life to find enough oxygen to survive. While fish and shrimp can move to areas with higher oxygen, some of the smaller marine life can’t escape and eventually die. Many of these ocean floor-dwelling creatures serve as food for fish and shrimp, which prevents the more mobile marine life from returning to the dead zone area even after oxygen levels rise.

In another words, as reported on the federal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) website: “Habitats that would normally be teeming with life become, essentially, biological deserts.”

What Causes the Dead Zone?

Learn about the Gulf of Mexico Dead ZoneFirst discovered in 1972, the Gulf of Mexico dead zone has returned each year in varying sizes. The largest was 2002, when the dead zone reached more than 8,000 square miles. But while the zone is smaller this year, it is nowhere near the less than 2,000 square miles scientists had hoped for by 2015. There are more than 500 dead zones around the world, with the largest in the Baltic Sea. The Gulf of Mexico is the second largest.

Scientists believe the primary cause of the dead zone is sewage and fertilizer that is carried by the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico. Some scientists believe the primary source are large agricultural operations that use chemicals which seep into the water table and eventually end up in rivers and tributaries that flow into the Mississippi River.

These extra nutrients cause massive algae blooms that choke off oxygen in the area. They may also turn the water brown.

Scientists with the NOAA and the federal Environmental Protection Agency have worked with agriculture companies to better control the use of fertilizers and other chemicals that contain phosphorus and nitrogen, both of which algae feed on. But the dead zone continues to remain a size that is troubling.

Cause for Concern

There are more casualties from dead zones than simply deep ocean dwelling animals.

For example, the NOAA estimates that the United States seafood and tourism industries lose $82 million annually because of algae blooms.

Also, the United Nations has estimated that the number of dead zones has doubled just about every year, meaning more strain put on the food chain in those areas.

Because intensive farming is the human activity most-linked to dead zones, the practice has come under scrutiny. Critics accuse large, intensive agricultural operations of using large amounts of pesticide and fertilizers to extract the largest amount of crops possible from an acre of land.

Some scientists also think the increased amount of corn being grown for ethanol has increased the amount of nutrients that seep into groundwater and eventually run into the Mississippi River. Corn takes a large amount of fertilizer to grow.

Possible Solutions

Scientists with NOAA, the EPA and other agencies think there are many different strategies that could result in smaller dead zones. These include:

  • Limiting the amount of nitrogen-rich fertilizers used by agricultural operations.
  • Implementing water conservation and increasing the use of recycled water
  • Searching out, finding and fixing leaks from wastewater treatment plants
  • Limiting the amount of animal waste that enters into the waterways
  • Restoration of wetlands. Millions of acres of wetlands have been lost over the last century, making it harder for water systems to absorb chemicals and waste. Federal, state and local governments are working on wetlands restoration projects around the country, including south Louisiana.

Despite the growth of dead zones over the past few decades, scientists remain optimistic that the trend can be reversed with these simple measures. But accomplishing them, given this year’s size of the Gulf of Mexico dead zone, may take longer than first anticipated.

Comments (5)
  • Avatar

    Jim Aug 23 2014 - 8:07 AM Reply

    Not a single mention of the catastrophic situation due to nuclear. Bring yourself up to date and do a search on enenews. Could it possibly be something to do with WIPP, Fukushima etc? You tell me when you’re up-to-date. Regards from the UK

    • Avatar

      Matthew Speer Aug 23 2014 - 9:08 AM Reply

      Jim, we appreciate the comment, though the nuclear threat, while critical, wasn’t a contributing factor in this particular case. Therefore coverage of that situation would have been misleading. Thanks for reading.

  • Avatar

    Bhaskar Aug 28 2014 - 1:54 AM Reply

    Growing Diatom Algae is perhaps the best solution to remove nutrients from water.

    In nature Diatoms account for about 40 to 50% of all primary production in waterways.
    Fertilizer runoff, sewage and animal dung is resulting in input of nutrient N and P into waterways but not of silica and micronutrients, this has upset the nutrient balance and algal composition, cyanobacteria / blue green algae has increased and diatoms have declined.

    So if diatoms are restored, cyanobacteria will decline and water will be clean and well oxygenated.

    Diatoms are the best food for fish in nature, so they do not accumulate since they are consumed by zooplankton and fish.

    People are not asking basic questions :
    If nutrients are consumed by algae to grow, why is increase in nutrient input a problem ?
    If algae consume nutrients and CO2 and produce O2, why are algal blooms causing decline in Dissolved Oxygen and increase in Dead Zones ?
    If algae are food for fish, why are there no fish blooms due to higher algae due to higher nutrient availability ?

    After all, farmers use fertilizers to produce more food for people and animals.
    More sewage is due to higher population.

    So on land the food chain is fine, but in water fish and oxygen are declining – why ?

  • Avatar

    ColtarTheBarbarian Jan 18 2015 - 9:16 PM Reply

    Greetings –

    I currently help coach a high school policy debate team, and our current topic is the exploration and development of the Earth’s oceans.

    This article is very useful to us, and we were hoping to ask the author a few questions and learn more about the author to allow us to present his credentials into the debate.

    Thank you so much!

Leave a reply

Reply to Matthew Speer Cancel reply

Name (required)


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.